|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
FOA - executive summary | The Strategic Planning and Implementation
Process |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
FOA - The Strategic Planning and Implementation Process After the survey results were compiled by Penn State researchers, four meetings were held so community members could study the survey results and develop community priorities. The York County Future of Agriculture Task Force identified six different priorities:
As group members met to discuss the survey results, these six different priorities became clear areas of importance to the farmers interviewed. These six priorities are discussed below in detail. From these six areas, the group then chose "high-priority" goals. Two areas were selected to be the initial focus for Action Teams that will work together with the community to achieve goals set forth among the group. These two areas were "Education of Non-farmers about Agriculture" and "Education of Farmers about Opportunities." The group decided the remaining four priority areas could be addressed, at least in part, under the two "education" areas, as well serve as future areas of emphasis.
Priority Issue: A concern that came up time
and time again in the "Let's Talk" sessions, as well as in the
surveys, was that farmers and their non-farm neighbors have different
answers to the question, "What is farming?"
Farmers perceive actions taken by the public, either directly or indirectly, which limit their ability to farm as a significant threat. An overwhelming majority of farmers (89%) believe that limited public understanding about agriculture is a threat to their farm activities (Table 1). Coupled with this concern, 85% of farmers also feel threatened by the increasing number of non-farm neighbors. The Future of Agriculture team considers these concerns to be key issues that need to be addressed in York County. One goal is to develop educational materials that will aid in educating the community about the value of agriculture in York County. Another goal is to put together programs and materials that will allow speakers to further educate public officials about agriculture, enabling them to make well informed land use planning decisions. The group is currently working on bolstering efforts for this year's Farm Tour, as well as using this Executive Summary as a resource for a speaker's bureau. Priority Issue: Figure
9: Farmers' Optimism about the Economic As seen in Figure 9,84% of farmers surveyed are noncommittal or pessimistic about the economic outlook for agriculture in the county. For this reason, the Future of Agriculture Action Teams concluded they should act to provide assistance that could improve the outlook for farmers. Survey results suggest that farmers would like to know more about opportunities that might help them to improve their operations and increase their incomes. A question in the survey asked farmers which alternative farming practices or marketing options they might be interested in learning more about. Table 2 lists responses from farmers who indicated interest in learning more about marketing options. Purchasing and Marketing Cooperatives were at the top of the list.
Purchasing Cooperatives allow farmers to join together to buy a certain good or input in volume at a lower price than they would be able to buy individually. Marketing Cooperatives allow farmers to combine their livestock or produce to sell to a buyer that they wouldn't necessarily be able to sell to as an individual farmer. Cooperatives help strengthen farmers bargaining power, maintain access to competitive markets, capitalize on new market opportunities, obtain needed products and services on a competitive basis, improve income opportunities, reduce costs, and manage risk. In addition to cooperatives, potential opportunity areas identified by the Action Team include, but are not limited to: educating farmers about better management practices, availability of financing opportunities, and regulations. Also, the team has identified the need to find better ways for farmers to communicate with local government officials such as township supervisors and zoning boards. Also under discussion is the creation of a farmer-to-farmer speaker's bureau that would allow farmers to regularly discuss problems they are facing as well as share opportunities with each other. Figure
6: Gross Farm Sales A continual theme from the
"Let's Talk" sessions was a lack of cohesiveness between small
and large farm operations. As seen in Figure 6, the number of mid-size
farms is decreasing. Farmers expressed a need for all sizes of agricultural
operations to work together more. This need, in part, is being addressed
by the Action Teams educating farmers about operations outside of their
own and promoting best practices in agriculture.
Risks to profitability are varied for most businesses. The situation is no different for York County farmers. As part of the survey, farmers were asked to indicate which factors were most critical to their farm business. Table 3 shows that increasing property taxes were cited as the number one factor critical to the farm businesses. The availability of farmland was second. Table 4 shows that 33% of the farmers surveyed indicated they had difficulty finding land to rent. Dairy and beef producers seem to have the most difficult time; 50% of dairy and beef producers indicated finding land to rent was a problem.
Priority Issue: Figure
10: Location of Farm Supplies and Marketing Good marketing strategies tie into the sustainability and profitability of the farm business. Figure 10 indicates adequate infrastructure for agriculture in York County. Inputs required for agricultural operations are generally readily available within the county and region. The challenge, however, is that about half of the inputs used are purchased in a neighboring county. This could be an indicator of possible future infrastructure instability that may impact agriculture. If these businesses were to relocate outside the region, farmers here in York County would have a difficult time getting the inputs they need.
Eighty percent of York County farmers said they have adequate access to markets for their farm products. These markets, however, might not be the most profitable for farmers. An exploration of new marketing opportunities and strategies, including cooperatives, could be an approach for the Future of Agriculture Action Teams to investigate. Table 5 shows 79% of farmers interviewed indicated that they felt a "Grown in York County" label should be created as a way to promote and market locally grown food products.
Farm succession is a relevant issue. Of the farmers surveyed, 22% were unsure how long they would continue to farm, while another 22% planned to farm less than 10 years (Figure 8). The aging population of farmers is also relevant. Of farmers aged 65 and older who responded, 43% indicated that they planned to discontinue farming within the next five years.
The Education of Farmers Action Team recognizes that information about farm succession is a priority issue for farm families with the potential to significantly impact the future of York County's agricultural landscape. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Penn
State | College of Agricultural
Sciences | Cooperative Extension
& Outreach
This page last updated Tuesday, November 10, 2009 Copyright Information This publication is available in alternative media on request. Penn State is an Affirmative Action, Equal Opportunity University. This site is a product of Penn State College of Agricultural Sciences. Please e-mail us with your questions, comments or suggestions at YorkExt@psu.edu. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||